Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 8:38 pm
:( should have read a different oneChris Graziano wrote:Nostalgia cured after one thread.
:( should have read a different oneChris Graziano wrote:Nostalgia cured after one thread.
Jaycy Ashleana wrote:Queen wrote:[insert something arguing against the idea].Teagan wrote: The OL's squire should be able to duel with four fancies like a warlord.
>.>Teagan wrote:Glad to know we're still capable of not taking personal shots at each other.
I don't know about the extra fancy, I think two squires would be better, aside from that I agree with the rest.XanthVanBokkelen wrote:I voted for the Grant, because I don't want to see the Overlord lose that either. I also like the ideaof an Overlord having a squire, though. I think the Overlord should have one squire, who gets an
automatic fancy, and two fancies if the Overlord is present. I think that is a good compromise.
Yes!Delahada wrote:The Overlord's personal padawan should be called something else, if we're going to do it. Something significantly singular and special. Like... Knight.
9 if you let the Overlord have two, which is surely a good thing because then you get 9 low ranking duelers with added punch for their lower rank. 2 squires also levels out the argument of the OL's Squire's having more advantage over others because the OL is dividing their time between two people.G wrote:Then the Overlord doesn't need squires since the 7 Barons can have them.