It's not off-topic, it's a sidenote. Nothing more.JewellRavenlock wrote:I think it'd be great to have them listed on the histories.Sylus Kurgen wrote: As a caveat...
I also spoke with Kalamere briefly about why Squires aren't on the DoS History pages with the Barons, or mentioned in the Reign Summaries. Giving the Overlord a Squire, is a good place to start tracking that. But I want to ask if there is any of you that want to go back through the forums and compile a list of who was Squire to which Baron?
Squires have been called a Minor Rank, to my mind..that means they go on the DoS Histories tab, as should the Talon. All on one page.
Is anyone willing to take on this task? I think it's an unfortunate oversight.
But that's kind of off topic. It neither makes up for the fact nor explains why we went from voting on the weapon to you deciding on a weapon that wasn't even listed in the original thread.
^ Dagger vs Shield would have been the vote. Dagger which would actually undermine the Talon, and Shield...which I realized doesn't match the mold set by the other Squire items.Sylus Kurgen wrote:In the previous discussion thread, things were leaning towards Dagger, which regardless of opinion does detract from the uniqueness of the Talon, and a Shield. The choices, weren't really choices at all.
I stopped myself and asked, "Why do the squires have the weapons they do?" and I asked G about it. He informed me that the Squire weapons, their symbols of station, are reflections of the physical location of the Baronies. The districts.
That changed my opinion and my mind about symbol of station for the Overlord Squire.
You're all upset about a decision being taken away. It's reasonable, and I lost some good will with it, apologizing won't fix that, it means I will work harder from now on.
So, to meet you all half way, or my way to try to do that and make it up to you all.
Swap out, Net for a Shield?
And what do YOU think is an appropriate minor enchantment for the Trident?
ETA: Putting a poll up.